Health insurers says Senate bill's Medicaid cuts to hurt states
Who Wins, Who Loses With Senate Health Care Bill — CHART
Not 'that far off' from passing health overhaul
Ohio government websites hacked with pro-Islamic State rant
Milwaukee ex-cop who fatally shot Sylville Smith found not guilty
Supreme Court Sides 5-3 Against Wisconsin Family in Property Rights Case
25 June 2017, 01:13 | Guillermo Sutton
The case had been closely watched by both property rights advocates and governments.
TOTENBERG: And what the Supreme Court said today was that property owners are not entitled to compensation from the government when regulations reduce the value of the property by a relatively small portion and where, as in this case, those regulations to some degree have enhanced the value of the property.
The frustration to the Murrs was that someone who had owned a single lot dating to before the regulations would still be allowed to build on it.
State and local regulations prevent the use or sale of adjacent lots under common ownership along the river as separate building sites unless they have at least one acre of land suitable for development.
After losing in the state courts, they appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. She said the county "always tried to be very fair to the Murr family and also follow the rules for how we manage the lands along the St. Croix River and protect the wetlands". A city ordinance requires that two adjacent parcels be considered one when totaling under one acre, an ordinance the Murrs challenged as a regulatory taking.
"The provision ... at issue here was for a specific and legitimate objective", he observed. He said the property as a whole remains valuable and the family could not claim they expected to sell or develop the lots separately given regulations that existed before they acquired the lots. In the end, he said, the loss in the value of the Murrs' land was only about 10 percent.
In 2004, Murr and her siblings sought to sell one of two parcels of land that had been in the family for decades.
Chief Justice John Roberts, in a scathing dissent, wrote that ruling was a significant blow for property rights and would give greater power to government bureaucrats to pass rules that diminish the value of property without having to compensate property owners under the Firth Amendment's Takings Clause.
William Treanor, Dean of Georgetown University Law Center, said the decision would have a profound effect in cases involving wetlands.
Through their attorneys at the Pacific Legal Foundation, the Murrs had argued that the two properties - the vacant lot and the lot with the cabin - have remained distinct legal entities since the family purchased them separately in the 1960s. The ruling could make it harder for property owners to prove compensation claims.
Harvard Law Professor Richard Lazarus called the decision a "clean, big win for both government regulators and environmental protection".
LAZARUS: It nearly never says that you can't do anything with all the property you own. "It just looks at the most environmentally sensitive part, and restricts your use of that piece".
The court's liberal wing, plus swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy, sided with the government. The Supreme Court's newest member, Justice Neil Gorsuch, did not participate in the case.
Roberts acknowledged that the test he suggested might have ended up with the same result, meaning the regulations at issue would not have amounted to a taking of private property, and the Murrs would not have qualified for compensation.
House votes to roll back post-2008 financial rules
It envisions restructuring the bankruptcy code to handle the failure of a bank or large lender that might threaten the economy. Financial stocks soared after the vote, which some say could push Republicans in the Senate to pursue more aggressive reform.
Tammy Abraham To Play For Premier League Side Next Season
Terry has played his last game for Chelsea with his contract with the Stamford Bridge outfit set to officially end on 1 July. He is poised to sign a bumper £45,000-a-week contract with Chelsea when he returns from worldwide duty.
Pence hires outside legal counsel
And attacked his own deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein (who now might resign or recuse himself ). Legal experts say Pence could tap money raised from his new leadership PAC to help pay legal expenses.
Boris Johnson calling for end to blockade of Qatar
There are many reasons, probably the first among them is ideological: Qatar is the base of the Muslim Brotherhood . The Taliban opened an office in Qatar in 2013, but the Qatari government later shut it down.
China's efforts on N. Korea not working
The jointly-operated industrial complex reportedly paid $100 million a year in wages to 54,000 North Korean workers. The route to inflicting significant economic pain on Kim's government remains through China.
Seattle police release tape of pregnant woman's shooting
She is now the 453rd person to be fatally shot by USA police in 2017, according to a database gathered by the Washington Post. Michaud said officers are required to carry a less-lethal option and have a choice between a Taser, baton or pepper spray.
Nabra Hassanen's Washington DC Memorial Set On Fire
The illegal alien allegedly took her body to a nearby pond and dumped her there for the authorities to later find. The teen was reported missing by her friends who scattered during the attack and could not find her afterwards.