Russian court: Telegram app must cooperate with spy agency
Saudi Army Bogged Down in Yemen: Iran
DMK President Stalin urges TN govt to stop Ram Rajya Rath Yatra
Janjua, Abdullah agree Taliban should utilise new, timely peace offer
Last male northern white rhino dies
Sen. Murphy: Trump So 'Unstable' He May Order Nuclear Strike
15 November 2017, 02:19 | Opal Carroll
Mikhail Svetlov Getty Images
Tuesday's hearing marks the first time since 1976 since either the House or Senate Foreign Relations Committees have examined the president's ability to use nuclear weapons.
"We are concerned that the president of the United States is so unstable, is so volatile, has a decision-making process that is so quixotic, that he might order a nuclear weapons strike that is wildly out of step with USA national security interests", Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from CT.
Mr Kehler said if he were uncertain about its legality, he would consult with his own advisers.
"The military does not blindly follow orders", he told the committee.
Only the president can give the order to pull the nuclear trigger. He said would immediately have questioned such an order, but publicly questioned the inherent risks.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a hearing on the president's powers to launch a nuclear strike, and chairman Bob Corker (R., Tenn.) said it was not specifically about Trump. The committee's Republican chairman, Bob Corker, accused President Trump last month of setting the United States "on a path to World War III".
And that, said Sen. Ed Markey, a Democrat from MA.
He quickly followed that up by saying "I fear that in the age of Trump, the cooler heads and strategic doctrine that we once relied upon as our last best hope against the unthinkable seem less reassuring than ever".
The president and his top officials have said repeatedly that North Korea would not be allowed to threaten the United States with nuclear weapons, but as Pyongyang has persisted with its nuclear and missile tests, it has been unclear what the administration would do to stop the regime. A North Korean official dubbed a tweet by Mr Trump a "declaration of war" after the president said that North Korean officials "won't be around much longer" if they continue with their escalating rhetoric over Pyongyang's nuclear program. "I don't think the assurances I've received today will be satisfying to the American people".
There are two situations in which the president decides to use nuclear force, Feaver said: When the president wakes up the military and when the military wakes up the president. "There would be a large group of advisers and legal advisers weighing in on this".
One issue under debate was the concept of imminent threat, when the president believes a country poses a sufficient immediate danger for the USA to order a pre-emptive nuclear strike.
No Trump administration officials are testifying before the hearing, which is examining the nuclear command and control structure that has served all U.S. presidents.
On Tuesday, former officials cautioned that adding Congress to the equation would hamper the U.S. response in a high-stress scenario without a lot of time.
"Even Gen. Kelly, the president's chief of staff, can't control the president's Twitter tantrums", Markey said. By the time Corker emerged from the hearing - the first to address the president's nuclear authority in over four decades - he was at a loss for what to do next. Gerald Ford was president.
"It should be the congressional prerogative to declare nuclear war", added Markey, who has written a bill to ban the president from being able to launch a first nuclear strike against North Korea without the authorization of Congress. "You'd either get a new secretary of defense or get a new commander".
As former Central Intelligence Agency director Michael Hayden put it, the current system "is designed for speed and decisiveness, it's not created to debate the decision".
If the USA wanted to retaliate before its weapons or command and control system were attacked, "the president would have less than 10 minutes to absorb the information, review his options, and make his decision", according to a 2016 Congressional Research Service report by nuclear arms expert Amy Woolf.
The comments struck at the heart of the reason the hearing took place.
"As a result", Markey said, "many Americans share my fear that the president's bombastic words could turn into nuclear reality".
"One of the things that voters think about" in United States presidential elections, Rubio said, "is whether or not they want to trust him with this capability".
Robbers Dig in Tunnel Into Bank, Loot 27 Lockers
Meanwhile, cops have already found the name of the person - Gena Prasad - who had rented the shop next to the bank. The police have formed 10 teams and have sent their officers to different places looking for the criminals.
Cut-off date set to spend old £10 notes
After the March deadline the old notes will only be able to be exchanged at the Bank of England. A decision is yet to be made on whether new £50 notes will be issued in polymer.
On Louis CK and the crumbling idea of the 'good man'
Louis has since addressed the matter and many of his vital relationships have fell by the side in the aftermath. Charlie Day was "appalled" to read the allegations, he said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times .
Tesla (NYSE:TSLA) Racial Bias Lawsuits 'Tearing Down Tesla'
In addition to the growing number of lawsuits the company is facing, a unionization campaign by United Auto Workers is underway. Overloaded with such allegations and lawsuits, Tesla is prepping to launch its semi truck on Thursday of this week.
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) Achieve New Highs
TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: This piece of content was originally posted by Week Herald and is the sole property of of Week Herald. JPMorgan Chase & Co. cut shares of Tyson Foods from a buy rating to a sell rating in a research note on Wednesday, October 12th.